Yesterday afternoon, my husband and I watched the film, “Twelve Angry Men”
It is a classic.
We frequently tape movies on Turner Classic Movies or our local PBS to watch together at a later date. Everything about the film is impressive and perhaps more relevant today
The writer, Reginald Rose, used a single setting, little action, and mostly dialogue to explore social issues; prejudice, segregation, and injustice.
Wikipedia states it nicely. “12 Angry Men explores many techniques of consensus-building and the difficulties encountered in the process among this group of men whose range of personalities adds to the intensity and conflict. It also explores the power one person has to elicit change. The jury members are identified only by number; no names are revealed until an exchange of dialogue at the very end. The film forces the characters and audience to evaluate their own self-image through observing the personality, experiences, and actions of the jurors.”
The gentlemen of the jury, many dressed in tie and jacket, appear civil . . . But tempers flare when Henry Fonda suggests things may not be what they appear.
It is a great movie.
. . . just saying
You don’t need a WordPress account or be a follower to comment. However, followers receive notification of new posts and reflect popularity.
Write your comment in the box below or click on the caption icon to the right of the title above. Ignore requests for a name or username and press post or save. Your comment will be posted anonymously.